Nancy Pelosi lost on the Cromnibus vote. But she made her point
By Chris Cillizza
December 11 at 10:17 PM - The Washington Post
The
House Thursday night passed a $1 trillion spending bill that averts a
shutdown and funds the vast majority of the government for the next year.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) was on the losing side of the
ledger. But she made her point.
That point? That she's tired of being forced to carry the water for the White
House and Senate Democrats who, she believes, are in the habit of cutting deals
without including her. "I'm giving you the leverage to do whatever you have
to do," Pelosi reportedly told her colleagues at the conclusion of a three-hour
long meeting Thursday night. "We have enough votes to show them never to do this
again."
The "they" is somewhat vague in Pelosi's formulation -- John
Boehner? Obama? Harry Reid? All of them? -- but her decision to take to the
House floor earlier in the day, after the White House had said Obama would sign
the bill if passed, makes clear who she was aiming at.
gIfm enormously disappointed that the White House feels that the
only way they can get a bill is to go along with this," Pelosi said. "That would
be the only reason I think they would say they would sign such a bill."
Shorter Pelosi: Stop taking me -- and liberal Democrats -- for
granted.
Pelosi's power play not only forced a delay of the vote, which was
originally planned for early Thursday afternoon, but also made the White House
send chief of staff Denis McDonough to Capitol Hill this evening to cajole/plead
with House Democrats to vote for the legislation. Even as the vote was called
shortly after 9 pm eastern, the outcome was very much in doubt -- an
uncertainty attributable to Pelosi's decision to publicly break with the White
House.
Remember that the power within the base of the Democratic party is
deeply grounded in an anti-Wall Street populism. That sentiment was stoked by
the inclusion of a measure in the broader spending bill that relaxed some
regulations on derivative trading for corporations. That revelation --
coupled with another
provision that would greatly expand the amount of money individuals could give
to national parties -- turned the legislation into a litmus test for
liberals.
So, yes, Pelosi -- and Massachusetts
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who spoke out forcefully against it too -- lost the
battle on the spending bill. But, they may have won the wider war -- or at
least scored a tactical victory that puts her and the party's liberal wing in a
stronger position come the 114th Congress.
What Pelosi's revolt made clear is that while there will be more
Republicans in the House and Senate come January, nothing can get done (or at
least nothing can get done easily) without some portion of liberal Democrats on
board. This was a warning to the White House and Senate Democrats not to
cut Pelosi out or take her (or her liberal Democratic allies) for granted
going forward.
Point made.